National Water Safety Agency

From complex reports to clean water decisions

Project type: MVP
Team: 11
Sprint time: 4 weeks

Project summary

Problem

Every year, the agency receives between 500 and 600 incident reports from water companies.

These reports can be up to 60 pages long and must be carefully reviewed and classified by a small team of inspectors.

They need to determine the severity of each incident and whether intervention is required – often against tight time pressures.

Manual classification was slow, repetitive, and resource-heavy.
It also delayed response times for high-severity events.

Process

I facilitated workshops with inspectors to understand how they reviewed reports and where delays happened.

Together, we mapped the current process, defined what data mattered most, and shaped a future-state flow using AI to classify and highlight key details.

I worked with AI engineers and the client to prioritise what to test first, then designed and refined the tool based on real feedback.

Early testing showed that inspectors found the summaries useful, the report highlighting intuitive, and the classifications "more accurate than expected."

Solution

A working AI-powered tool that reads, classifies, and explains incident reports in minutes, not hours – highlighting critical risks and surfacing supporting evidence for each classification.

Impact

Cut report review time from 1.5 hours to 30 minutes — a ~66% reduction

Improved classification accuracy from 90% to 100% — an ~11% improvement

Reduced delays in intervention decisions

Validated in early testing by inspectors as “very promising” and “exactly what we want”


My role

I co-led discovery workshops, defined the user journey, and designed the user interface.

I worked closely with AI engineers to shape how model outputs were surfaced to inspectors — from summaries and reasoning trails to risk categories and visual clarity.

  • Ran design thinking workshops with inspectors to understand how reports were received, reviewed, and classified

  • Documented the key data they needed to make decisions and spotted where delays happened

  • Co-created a “to-be” scenario with the client,
    their ideal future process

  • Explored how generative AI could help classify and highlight important parts of each report

  • Prioritised a solution to test with the client and AI engineers

  • Designed and refined the tool through several rounds of feedback

Full case study available on request

Previous
Previous

Insights that build better submarines

Next
Next

Unleashing AI-powered creative companions